Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 59(4): 473-478, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253868

RESUMEN

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has become a standard in preventing GVHD in related and unrelated donor transplantation, but there is no consensus on the best administration schedule. The PARACHUTE trial reported excellent CD4 immune reconstitution (CD4 IR) using a dosing schedule based on the patient's weight and pre-conditioning absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). In 2015 we introduced the PARACHUTE dosing schedule for pediatric patients at our center. One hundred one patients were transplanted for malignant and non-malignant diseases. In this non-concurrent cohort CD4 IR+, defined by a single CD4 count >50/µL on day 90, was seen in 81% of patients. The incidence of grade II-IV and III to IV aGvHD was 26.6% and 15.3% and 5% for cGvHD with no severe cases. We found no difference in aGvHD between donor type and stem cell sources. Five-year EFS and OS were 77.5% and 83.5%. Grade III-IV GFRS was 75.2%. CD4 IR+ patients had better EFS (93.1% vs. 77.7%, p = 0.04) and lower non-relapse mortality (2.7% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.002). The PARACHUTE ATG dosing schedule individualized by weight and ALC results in good early immune reconstitution, low incidence of cGvHD, and favorable survival for patients with different disease groups, donor types, and stem cell sources.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Humanos , Niño , Suero Antilinfocítico/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Recuento de Linfocitos , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante/métodos , Donante no Emparentado , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 28(2): e563-e567, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33859125

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Symptom management in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains a complex challenge. Widespread use of cannabis-based medicines for a myriad of symptoms has fostered rheumatology patients' interest. However, their safety and efficacy in RA remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a structured summary of the body of evidence in order to determine whether cannabis, cannabis-derived products, and synthetic cannabinoids are an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: An electronic search in Epistemonikos database was performed to identify systematic reviews and their primary studies that addressed our clinical question. The body of evidence was collected in a pivot table in Epistemonikos. Information and data from the primary studies were extracted from the identified reviews. Finally, extracted data were reanalyzed, and a summary of findings table was generated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Twenty-six systematic reviews were identified which included in total only 1 randomized trial assessing our clinical question. CONCLUSIONS: Cannabis, cannabis-derived products and synthetic cannabinoids may slightly reduce disease activity in patients with RA. Its use may result in little to no difference in pain reduction and may slightly increase nervous system adverse events. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of cannabis, cannabis-derived products, and synthetic cannabinoids on serious adverse events risk.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Cannabinoides , Cannabis , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Cannabinoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...